Dear Recaps Readers,
We are once again finding there are lots of rumors floating around Dinarland we would like to address:
On several sites it is once again being stated as fact that the owner of Dinar Recaps is really Mountain Goat. Dr.Clarke or both. lol
Also that we refuse to post some intel providers because they are the only ones with “the truth” and we are afraid it will “lose readers “ if they know the “real truth”.
Well……..I’m sure there are many intel providers who may think that they are the only ones with the only real intel about the RV/GCR…..but many are still bashing other intel providers in a negative and derogatory manner. That is why we do not post them.
From the Beginning Dinar Recaps has stated that we will not post any negative, bashing, name calling or profanity toward others.
....
We are once again finding there are lots of rumors floating around Dinarland we would like to address:
On several sites it is once again being stated as fact that the owner of Dinar Recaps is really Mountain Goat. Dr.Clarke or both. lol
Also that we refuse to post some intel providers because they are the only ones with “the truth” and we are afraid it will “lose readers “ if they know the “real truth”.
Well……..I’m sure there are many intel providers who may think that they are the only ones with the only real intel about the RV/GCR…..but many are still bashing other intel providers in a negative and derogatory manner. That is why we do not post them.
From the Beginning Dinar Recaps has stated that we will not post any negative, bashing, name calling or profanity toward others.
....
If these people who claim to have the “only truth” would like to share in a respectful manner we would consider posting their information on our blog.
There really are a lot of pieces to this huge RV/GCR puzzle and we welcome other insights.
Another rumor we have seen in several places is that any Currency holder NOT in a group will never be allowed to exchange.
If a currency of any said country is international and recognized as the currency of that country we believe that anyone will be able to go and exchange at any bank or foreign currency exchange facility for the current international rate offered by that country.
Just like if you visit Mexico on vacation and exchange your pesos back to USD when you return…….
Of course "private groups" may have different rates and conditions at your exchange appointment but since Recaps is not affiliated with any group…you will need to find out those terms from your group coordinators post RV. Sorry, Dinar Recaps has no more information about "groups", and does not know how to join one. (So do NOT email us asking about them.)
So to be clear:
Dinar Recaps does not make up intel under an assumed name. We just gather and post News, Rumors, and Opinions from OTHER people and many sites in Dinarland so our busy, hard-working readers can get the highlights in one place. NOTHING posted at Dinar Recaps is from anyone at Dinar Recaps.
We are Currency Holders just like all of you and we really hope that this long roller- coaster/journey/adventure will be over for us all very soon.
And we pray that all our dreams will come true!!
Thanks again to all of you for reading Dinar Recaps ~~
Sincerely,
The Dinar Recaps Team
.
P.S This is a very good article about different views and prospectives about the same subject~enjoy
http://ift.tt/1Hj4xX5
There really are a lot of pieces to this huge RV/GCR puzzle and we welcome other insights.
Another rumor we have seen in several places is that any Currency holder NOT in a group will never be allowed to exchange.
If a currency of any said country is international and recognized as the currency of that country we believe that anyone will be able to go and exchange at any bank or foreign currency exchange facility for the current international rate offered by that country.
Just like if you visit Mexico on vacation and exchange your pesos back to USD when you return…….
Of course "private groups" may have different rates and conditions at your exchange appointment but since Recaps is not affiliated with any group…you will need to find out those terms from your group coordinators post RV. Sorry, Dinar Recaps has no more information about "groups", and does not know how to join one. (So do NOT email us asking about them.)
So to be clear:
Dinar Recaps does not make up intel under an assumed name. We just gather and post News, Rumors, and Opinions from OTHER people and many sites in Dinarland so our busy, hard-working readers can get the highlights in one place. NOTHING posted at Dinar Recaps is from anyone at Dinar Recaps.
We are Currency Holders just like all of you and we really hope that this long roller- coaster/journey/adventure will be over for us all very soon.
And we pray that all our dreams will come true!!
Thanks again to all of you for reading Dinar Recaps ~~
Sincerely,
The Dinar Recaps Team
.
P.S This is a very good article about different views and prospectives about the same subject~enjoy
http://ift.tt/1Hj4xX5
Once there were three blind men who were given the task of describing an elephant. Each was led into an elephant pen by way of a different gate.
The first man approached the elephant from the front and groped around the elephant’s trunk. The second encountered the elephant from the rear and grabbed the tail. The last man walked into a leg and felt around that part of the elephant.
Then the men were led out of the pen and asked to describe the appearance of an elephant. Well, being blind, none of them had ever actually seen an elephant, but each of them did have a very real perspective from which to share; and share they did.
Then the men were led out of the pen and asked to describe the appearance of an elephant. Well, being blind, none of them had ever actually seen an elephant, but each of them did have a very real perspective from which to share; and share they did.
They all agreed that an elephant is round. After all, the trunk, tail, and leg are all basically round in shape. But that is where the similarities ended. Before long, the discussion turned ugly.
The first man approached the elephant from the front and groped around the elephant’s trunk. The second encountered the elephant from the rear and grabbed the tail. The last man walked into a leg and felt around that part of the elephant.
Then the men were led out of the pen and asked to describe the appearance of an elephant. Well, being blind, none of them had ever actually seen an elephant, but each of them did have a very real perspective from which to share; and share they did.
Then the men were led out of the pen and asked to describe the appearance of an elephant. Well, being blind, none of them had ever actually seen an elephant, but each of them did have a very real perspective from which to share; and share they did.
They all agreed that an elephant is round. After all, the trunk, tail, and leg are all basically round in shape. But that is where the similarities ended. Before long, the discussion turned ugly.
Each man knew that he was correct. After all, he had touched the elephant! You can’t get much closer to a source that than that.
Two of the men, each armed with unequivocal, undeniable, unimpeachable information, felt compelled to argue their cases. They felt it was their duty to convince all other blind people the “truth” about the elephant. These two men looked for every opportunity to pursue their duty, sharing elephant truths.
And other blind people appreciated their efforts and began to ask questions. Some members of the blind community liked hearing about the “trunk” description. Others thought that the “tail” description was closer to the truth. And these two men enjoyed their new-found popularity greatly.
In order to have more things to talk about, one of these same two men, researched Braille articles about elephants.
Unfortunately, some of the articles were written by folks with ulterior motives—ivory hunters, ruthless poachers, who cared only about the monetary value of elephants.
The blind man either didn’t know that some of the articles were intentionally deceptive, or perhaps he didn’t care. After all, the articles did provide talking points, which in turn increased his popularity.
The second argumentative blind man was content simply to argue. The louder he argued the more attention he got. Healthy, informed debate is good and productive.
Too bad this one fellow would occasionally resort to name calling, all the while claiming to be the only source of real elephant truth.
Nevertheless, he maintained a substantial following among the blind community and, to a large degree, that was all that mattered; much more so than the elephant.
What about the third blind man? Well, he was out there all the time. He too shared his perspective of the elephant, his own brand of elephant truth. His perspective was limited too, but he shared what he knew to be true.
The difference is, this man stayed true to his mission—sharing truth about elephants. He didn’t rail against the tail perspective. He didn’t throw a tantrum when new trunk information got released. He merely shared what he knew and let members of the blind community do with it what they will.
As you can see, not all the blind men behaved the same way. They did however, have several things in common. They all had great connections (which explains why they were selected as elephant describers in the first place).
These connections afforded them a certain measure of special status within the blind community. Additionally, all three blind men had valid perspectives. After all, their descriptions of the trunk, tail and leg were all accurate.
And let’s not forget the last thing they had in common—they were all blind! Special status or not, they were all members of the blind community.
Thus, while all of them had real information regarding a portion of the elephant, none of them understood the whole elephant.
Ultimately, the complete truth about the elephant resides with one Person—the Creator of the elephant.
If only the blind men knew this. I believe they did. Perhaps all that talk about the elephant created a temporary blind spot.
Go Elephant!
Two of the men, each armed with unequivocal, undeniable, unimpeachable information, felt compelled to argue their cases. They felt it was their duty to convince all other blind people the “truth” about the elephant. These two men looked for every opportunity to pursue their duty, sharing elephant truths.
And other blind people appreciated their efforts and began to ask questions. Some members of the blind community liked hearing about the “trunk” description. Others thought that the “tail” description was closer to the truth. And these two men enjoyed their new-found popularity greatly.
In order to have more things to talk about, one of these same two men, researched Braille articles about elephants.
Unfortunately, some of the articles were written by folks with ulterior motives—ivory hunters, ruthless poachers, who cared only about the monetary value of elephants.
The blind man either didn’t know that some of the articles were intentionally deceptive, or perhaps he didn’t care. After all, the articles did provide talking points, which in turn increased his popularity.
The second argumentative blind man was content simply to argue. The louder he argued the more attention he got. Healthy, informed debate is good and productive.
Too bad this one fellow would occasionally resort to name calling, all the while claiming to be the only source of real elephant truth.
Nevertheless, he maintained a substantial following among the blind community and, to a large degree, that was all that mattered; much more so than the elephant.
What about the third blind man? Well, he was out there all the time. He too shared his perspective of the elephant, his own brand of elephant truth. His perspective was limited too, but he shared what he knew to be true.
The difference is, this man stayed true to his mission—sharing truth about elephants. He didn’t rail against the tail perspective. He didn’t throw a tantrum when new trunk information got released. He merely shared what he knew and let members of the blind community do with it what they will.
As you can see, not all the blind men behaved the same way. They did however, have several things in common. They all had great connections (which explains why they were selected as elephant describers in the first place).
These connections afforded them a certain measure of special status within the blind community. Additionally, all three blind men had valid perspectives. After all, their descriptions of the trunk, tail and leg were all accurate.
And let’s not forget the last thing they had in common—they were all blind! Special status or not, they were all members of the blind community.
Thus, while all of them had real information regarding a portion of the elephant, none of them understood the whole elephant.
Ultimately, the complete truth about the elephant resides with one Person—the Creator of the elephant.
If only the blind men knew this. I believe they did. Perhaps all that talk about the elephant created a temporary blind spot.
Go Elephant!
via Dinar Recaps - Our Blog http://ift.tt/29KJ6EK
No comments:
Post a Comment