Post From Philosophy of Metrics
More Thoughts On “China Just Ended The Dollar Peg (…For The Most Part)
Dane I’m in the process of validating this article but my vision is beginning to see in triplicate….HELP! LOL.
“Wednesday morning in Washington, Republican and Democratic Party members of the US Congress announced agreement on an omnibus spending bill that included a provision to legally enact reforms to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) agreed by the Obama Administration in 2010, according to a report by AFP.”
Here is the article. “US Congress moves on IMF reforms” (1 hour ago from 1:04pm EST)
~~~
More Thoughts On “China Just Ended The Dollar Peg (…For The Most Part)
Dane I’m in the process of validating this article but my vision is beginning to see in triplicate….HELP! LOL.
“Wednesday morning in Washington, Republican and Democratic Party members of the US Congress announced agreement on an omnibus spending bill that included a provision to legally enact reforms to the International Monetary Fund (IMF) agreed by the Obama Administration in 2010, according to a report by AFP.”
Here is the article. “US Congress moves on IMF reforms” (1 hour ago from 1:04pm EST)
~~~
Here is the article. “US Congress moves on IMF reforms”
http://ift.tt/1RSyfVE
Here is the omnibus spending bill.
http://ift.tt/1T0Z7Bc
Heres another article on it.
“US Congress advances long-delayed IMF reforms” (2 hours ago from 1:04pm EST)
http://ift.tt/1O9vDmz
Dane The omnibus spending bill goes before congress for approval/disapproval on Friday. If the wording of the omnibus spending bill allows the 2010 reforms to be ratified then would it be ratified right away or will it come later? These are tricky words.
I’m getting the gist that the wording allows for it but that doesn’t mean its passed or even brought before the house. Ryan says when a new bill is submitted congress has to be given 3 days to review it.
http://ift.tt/1Zc2dGc
Alan @Dane Wow! Your finger is on the pulse of the PoM analysis :) Wow!
Dane Haha thanks Alan. Its either this or venturing out with all these Christmas shoppers…..that would really test my survival skills :)
What’s coming to mind is that since China…(well the G20 – the G7 right)…has stepped up to the plate with plan B, is that the US congress will get everything ready to ratify the 2010 reforms with the TPP.
Some are saying the TPP won’t be voted on until the lame duck session in Nov or Dec 2016 but the white house seems to want to get it in front of congress before that. Also it just seems too late by then.
I mean the renminbi will become effective in Oct. 2016 so wouldn’t that make the ratification a mute point? If plan B is used then would the ratification simply remove the US’s veto power? Maybe a combination of both? “White House wants trade vote before lame duck”
http://ift.tt/1X7pPL0
Dane The spending bill passed.
“Early Friday morning the House passed the $1.1 trillion spending portion of the deal on a 316 to 113 vote, with 150 Republicans and 166 Democrats supporting the measure, after passing the $622 billion tax section of the agreement Thursday on a 318 to 109 vote.
The Senate soon after passed both parts of the agreement on a 65 to 33 vote. President Obama is expected to sign the legislation into law.”
http://ift.tt/1QvkMnu
research zurgg where can we find docs on the BIS 40 currencies gauge ?
JC Collins I’m looking and will put something together.
Dane Someone was worried about the Russia/Ukraine financial issue a little while back. The IMF came out with this report on that issue.
http://ift.tt/1QqRbf8
tomaz vidmar Hi JC, links to several posts in THE REDBACK REVOLUTION do not work…. tried few times, always same answer – not able to find
JC Collins I just updated the links. Hopefully they work.
rudd van dyne All systems corrupt. Some derivatives will fail, and some will not.
I’m explaining a process, not a moral tale of ineptitude.
Most people’s idea of fairness is “what’s in it for me” and “how can I get more while doing less”. Unfortunately these types of attitudes infect all demographics and socioeconomic levels.
I personally would change these statements to:
All corrupt systems corrupt further.
Some money games will fail one party, and some will fail the other party.
I am explaining a corrupt process as a process, not a moral tale whatsoever.
Most banker’s idea’s on fairness are “what’s in it for me” and “how can I get more digits for less digits” Unfortunately these elite attitudes infect all demographics….
But yeah, just a clown speaking.
In all due respect, as I feel for you, and your burden of reading this type of stuff.
Dane “China’s UnionPay Steps Into Mobile Commerce Deal With UK Startup”
http://ift.tt/1Ny7Kj4
“Apple Pay, Samsung Pay to duel in China next year”
http://ift.tt/1QzVtAy
“Apple Bringing Apple Pay to China With UnionPay”
http://ift.tt/1MkIGKA
“Apple to launch Apple Pay in China, take on Alibaba, Tencent”
http://ift.tt/1ZfBYi4
“Apple, Samsung to Enter China Payments Market With UnionPay”
http://ift.tt/1Rsl0Mc
Tony Graupp Greetings JC… Interesting thought here, that I would like your comment on….
I read somewhere that Christine LaGarde’s term as head of the IMF only runs through June or July next year… Supposedly it’s a 5 year term…
There is an outside possibility she may be involved in some court case in France next year….
Do you think the possibility of her leaving would have any effect on the China/Yuan deal…
All this stuff that has been happening with the Yuan, has mostly happened in the last 5 years….since 2010…. Take Care Tony
Tony Graupp Greetings JC; This is an interesting article you “”MUST”” attended to;
Is Bloomberg Hiding Something? Hugo Salinas Price
Bloomberg has been gathering data on the total of Central Bank International Reserves for many years. Since December 1, 2010, the information has been updated every Friday, and has been available on a Bloomberg website, accessible only by subscription.
On Friday, December 11 of the present year, Bloomberg published no information regarding International Reserves as of that date.
On Friday, December 18, once more, Bloomberg published no information regarding International Reserves as of that date.
Curiously enough, on Monday, December 1, 2015, we published an article on this website, click here
“The Crumbling World Order, and Who Will Pick Up the Crumbs?” which pointed out that International Reserves have been contracting since August 2014 and up to November 27, 2015, had diminished by $752 billion dollars, or 6.25% of the total achieved at the peak back in August, 2014.
And we remarked that this contraction was unprecedented, since we have data going back to 1948, and never, ever, has there been a sustained contraction in the total of Central Bank International Reserves since the creation of the present international monetary system in 1944, at Bretton Woods.
In our opinion, the present contraction of International Reserves announces a secular change of trend to liquidation of international debt and consequently to Depression.
Why has Bloomberg decided to suspend the publication of International Reserves on its website? Is Bloomberg hiding information from the public? Has Bloomberg been pressured to suspend publication of sensitive data?
We hope Bloomberg resumes publication of the important data on International Reserves at once. Take Care Tony Graupp
Tony Graupp As Napoleon Bonaparte said 200 years ago;
“”We will pay in gold or we will not pay””
=====================
01/December/2015
The Crumbling World Order and Who Will Pick Up the Crumbs?
By: Hugo Salinas Price
In the last fifteen months, from August 1, 2104 to November 27, 2015, International Reserves, as calculated by Bloomberg, have fallen three-quarters of a trillion ($752 billion) dollars, or 6.52%. International Reserves peaked at $12.032 Trillion on August 1, 2014, and have fallen since then to $11.28 Trillion on November 27, 2105.
Central Banks increase their Reserves by purchasing Government Bonds – denominated in Dollars, Euros, Pounds or Yen – when those currencies come into their hands as a result of a surplus of exports over imports; all countries strive to have such surpluses, because if they are not able to export more than they import, then they are condemned to devalue their currencies in order to make their exports more attractive; they are also burdened with higher interest rates on their borrowings, as a result of the threat of further devaluation.
Higher interest rates in turn, exacerbate the outflow of Reserve currencies and make devaluation all the more necessary.
The fact is that countries holding Reserves have not been paid for the totality of their export surpluses. To hold Reserves is to grant credit. The proof is that Reserves held by the exporting countries are Bonds, that is to say, certificates of debt.
The last figure for International Reserves, as of November 27, is $11,280,000,000,000 Dollars – $11.28 Trillion Dollars. The figure nicely documents the total value of what the exporters of the world have sold to the countries which issue Reserve Currencies, and for which they have not been paid, since August 15, 1971.
At the present time, the system at work since the end of World War II is operating in reverse. Reserves are falling, the majority of which are held in Dollars. Government Bonds held as Reserves are being sold off. An important contraction in world commerce is taking place.
The exporting countries are not obtaining excess funds (from their exports over their imports) with which to purchase Government Bonds for Reserves.
On the contrary, a flight of Capital from the exporting countries to the Reserve issuing countries is taking place, and the Central Banks of the exporting countries are selling off their Reserves, to provide funds for the Capital flight.
When 6.52% of the total Reserves has been sold into the market, one would expect the value of the related Bonds to fall, and their interest rates to rise, other things being equal. If their interest rates have not risen, it must be due to the generosity of the buyers of the Bonds.
Perhaps the entities that show such generosity in their purchases are the same entities who sold the Bonds in the first place, the Federal Reserve among others?
The Fed and the ECB have been in comfortable position of lowering interest rates and thus raising the value of the Government Bonds they sell. When the long term Bond rate is lowered from 4% to 2%, the value of those Bonds tends to double.
But when the 2% rate rises just a bit to 2.25%, the value of the long term Bond falls very sharply. The Fed and the ECB must buy back the Bonds which are being sold in this liquidity crisis, or else the whole Bond universe collapses.
China’s Yuan has recently been accepted by the IMF, to form a part of its “basket of currencies” and as of Oct. 1, 2016 the Yuan will be anointed as a Reserve Currency by the IMF. When that happens, China will have its own Reserve Currency, and less need to maintain its present enormous pile of Reserves in Dollar and Euro Government Bonds. So the sell-off of International Reserves might become even stronger.
The Fed and the ECB have enjoyed selling Bonds at ever higher prices and ever lower interest rates, so low that in Europe these Bonds have a negative yield. They will have to develop an appetite for Bonds, because China is going to send a bunch of them back to the sellers when the Yuan achieves Reserve Currency status.
As China liquidates a portion of its Reserves, guess what China is going to buy with the Dollars and Euros it receives for its Dollar and Euro Bonds?
The majority of Reserves are held in Dollars, as we have said, and when the Dollar Bonds are sold, they are sold for Dollars to satisfy the Capital flight, and buying the Dollar makes its relative value rise.
From a low point, some years ago, of about 71 against a basket of currencies, the Dollar has appreciated to 100 at the present time, increasing the strain upon debtors (in the exporting countries) who owe Dollars by some 41%. The strain upon the debtors increases the urgency in getting out of Dollar debt and stimulates the related Capital flight.
What we are witnessing these days is a mighty contraction in economic activity around the world, that reinforces itself. International Reserves are being sold off in a desperate search for liquidity. The contraction was originally seeded by a slow-down in the economies of the Reserve-issuing countries, i.e., USA, Britain, Europe and Japan.
The Chinese evidently have some plans which they are not divulging, for we see that China is purchasing huge amounts of gold. In the meantime, the US insists on trashing the price of gold, as if to say that the Dollar is and will remain the world’s supreme currency till the end of time.
http://ift.tt/1RSyfVE
Here is the omnibus spending bill.
http://ift.tt/1T0Z7Bc
Heres another article on it.
“US Congress advances long-delayed IMF reforms” (2 hours ago from 1:04pm EST)
http://ift.tt/1O9vDmz
Dane The omnibus spending bill goes before congress for approval/disapproval on Friday. If the wording of the omnibus spending bill allows the 2010 reforms to be ratified then would it be ratified right away or will it come later? These are tricky words.
I’m getting the gist that the wording allows for it but that doesn’t mean its passed or even brought before the house. Ryan says when a new bill is submitted congress has to be given 3 days to review it.
http://ift.tt/1Zc2dGc
Alan @Dane Wow! Your finger is on the pulse of the PoM analysis :) Wow!
Dane Haha thanks Alan. Its either this or venturing out with all these Christmas shoppers…..that would really test my survival skills :)
What’s coming to mind is that since China…(well the G20 – the G7 right)…has stepped up to the plate with plan B, is that the US congress will get everything ready to ratify the 2010 reforms with the TPP.
Some are saying the TPP won’t be voted on until the lame duck session in Nov or Dec 2016 but the white house seems to want to get it in front of congress before that. Also it just seems too late by then.
I mean the renminbi will become effective in Oct. 2016 so wouldn’t that make the ratification a mute point? If plan B is used then would the ratification simply remove the US’s veto power? Maybe a combination of both? “White House wants trade vote before lame duck”
http://ift.tt/1X7pPL0
Dane The spending bill passed.
“Early Friday morning the House passed the $1.1 trillion spending portion of the deal on a 316 to 113 vote, with 150 Republicans and 166 Democrats supporting the measure, after passing the $622 billion tax section of the agreement Thursday on a 318 to 109 vote.
The Senate soon after passed both parts of the agreement on a 65 to 33 vote. President Obama is expected to sign the legislation into law.”
http://ift.tt/1QvkMnu
research zurgg where can we find docs on the BIS 40 currencies gauge ?
JC Collins I’m looking and will put something together.
Dane Someone was worried about the Russia/Ukraine financial issue a little while back. The IMF came out with this report on that issue.
http://ift.tt/1QqRbf8
tomaz vidmar Hi JC, links to several posts in THE REDBACK REVOLUTION do not work…. tried few times, always same answer – not able to find
JC Collins I just updated the links. Hopefully they work.
rudd van dyne All systems corrupt. Some derivatives will fail, and some will not.
I’m explaining a process, not a moral tale of ineptitude.
Most people’s idea of fairness is “what’s in it for me” and “how can I get more while doing less”. Unfortunately these types of attitudes infect all demographics and socioeconomic levels.
I personally would change these statements to:
All corrupt systems corrupt further.
Some money games will fail one party, and some will fail the other party.
I am explaining a corrupt process as a process, not a moral tale whatsoever.
Most banker’s idea’s on fairness are “what’s in it for me” and “how can I get more digits for less digits” Unfortunately these elite attitudes infect all demographics….
But yeah, just a clown speaking.
In all due respect, as I feel for you, and your burden of reading this type of stuff.
Dane “China’s UnionPay Steps Into Mobile Commerce Deal With UK Startup”
http://ift.tt/1Ny7Kj4
“Apple Pay, Samsung Pay to duel in China next year”
http://ift.tt/1QzVtAy
“Apple Bringing Apple Pay to China With UnionPay”
http://ift.tt/1MkIGKA
“Apple to launch Apple Pay in China, take on Alibaba, Tencent”
http://ift.tt/1ZfBYi4
“Apple, Samsung to Enter China Payments Market With UnionPay”
http://ift.tt/1Rsl0Mc
Tony Graupp Greetings JC… Interesting thought here, that I would like your comment on….
I read somewhere that Christine LaGarde’s term as head of the IMF only runs through June or July next year… Supposedly it’s a 5 year term…
There is an outside possibility she may be involved in some court case in France next year….
Do you think the possibility of her leaving would have any effect on the China/Yuan deal…
All this stuff that has been happening with the Yuan, has mostly happened in the last 5 years….since 2010…. Take Care Tony
Tony Graupp Greetings JC; This is an interesting article you “”MUST”” attended to;
Is Bloomberg Hiding Something? Hugo Salinas Price
Bloomberg has been gathering data on the total of Central Bank International Reserves for many years. Since December 1, 2010, the information has been updated every Friday, and has been available on a Bloomberg website, accessible only by subscription.
On Friday, December 11 of the present year, Bloomberg published no information regarding International Reserves as of that date.
On Friday, December 18, once more, Bloomberg published no information regarding International Reserves as of that date.
Curiously enough, on Monday, December 1, 2015, we published an article on this website, click here
“The Crumbling World Order, and Who Will Pick Up the Crumbs?” which pointed out that International Reserves have been contracting since August 2014 and up to November 27, 2015, had diminished by $752 billion dollars, or 6.25% of the total achieved at the peak back in August, 2014.
And we remarked that this contraction was unprecedented, since we have data going back to 1948, and never, ever, has there been a sustained contraction in the total of Central Bank International Reserves since the creation of the present international monetary system in 1944, at Bretton Woods.
In our opinion, the present contraction of International Reserves announces a secular change of trend to liquidation of international debt and consequently to Depression.
Why has Bloomberg decided to suspend the publication of International Reserves on its website? Is Bloomberg hiding information from the public? Has Bloomberg been pressured to suspend publication of sensitive data?
We hope Bloomberg resumes publication of the important data on International Reserves at once. Take Care Tony Graupp
Tony Graupp As Napoleon Bonaparte said 200 years ago;
“”We will pay in gold or we will not pay””
=====================
01/December/2015
The Crumbling World Order and Who Will Pick Up the Crumbs?
By: Hugo Salinas Price
In the last fifteen months, from August 1, 2104 to November 27, 2015, International Reserves, as calculated by Bloomberg, have fallen three-quarters of a trillion ($752 billion) dollars, or 6.52%. International Reserves peaked at $12.032 Trillion on August 1, 2014, and have fallen since then to $11.28 Trillion on November 27, 2105.
Central Banks increase their Reserves by purchasing Government Bonds – denominated in Dollars, Euros, Pounds or Yen – when those currencies come into their hands as a result of a surplus of exports over imports; all countries strive to have such surpluses, because if they are not able to export more than they import, then they are condemned to devalue their currencies in order to make their exports more attractive; they are also burdened with higher interest rates on their borrowings, as a result of the threat of further devaluation.
Higher interest rates in turn, exacerbate the outflow of Reserve currencies and make devaluation all the more necessary.
The fact is that countries holding Reserves have not been paid for the totality of their export surpluses. To hold Reserves is to grant credit. The proof is that Reserves held by the exporting countries are Bonds, that is to say, certificates of debt.
The last figure for International Reserves, as of November 27, is $11,280,000,000,000 Dollars – $11.28 Trillion Dollars. The figure nicely documents the total value of what the exporters of the world have sold to the countries which issue Reserve Currencies, and for which they have not been paid, since August 15, 1971.
At the present time, the system at work since the end of World War II is operating in reverse. Reserves are falling, the majority of which are held in Dollars. Government Bonds held as Reserves are being sold off. An important contraction in world commerce is taking place.
The exporting countries are not obtaining excess funds (from their exports over their imports) with which to purchase Government Bonds for Reserves.
On the contrary, a flight of Capital from the exporting countries to the Reserve issuing countries is taking place, and the Central Banks of the exporting countries are selling off their Reserves, to provide funds for the Capital flight.
When 6.52% of the total Reserves has been sold into the market, one would expect the value of the related Bonds to fall, and their interest rates to rise, other things being equal. If their interest rates have not risen, it must be due to the generosity of the buyers of the Bonds.
Perhaps the entities that show such generosity in their purchases are the same entities who sold the Bonds in the first place, the Federal Reserve among others?
The Fed and the ECB have been in comfortable position of lowering interest rates and thus raising the value of the Government Bonds they sell. When the long term Bond rate is lowered from 4% to 2%, the value of those Bonds tends to double.
But when the 2% rate rises just a bit to 2.25%, the value of the long term Bond falls very sharply. The Fed and the ECB must buy back the Bonds which are being sold in this liquidity crisis, or else the whole Bond universe collapses.
China’s Yuan has recently been accepted by the IMF, to form a part of its “basket of currencies” and as of Oct. 1, 2016 the Yuan will be anointed as a Reserve Currency by the IMF. When that happens, China will have its own Reserve Currency, and less need to maintain its present enormous pile of Reserves in Dollar and Euro Government Bonds. So the sell-off of International Reserves might become even stronger.
The Fed and the ECB have enjoyed selling Bonds at ever higher prices and ever lower interest rates, so low that in Europe these Bonds have a negative yield. They will have to develop an appetite for Bonds, because China is going to send a bunch of them back to the sellers when the Yuan achieves Reserve Currency status.
As China liquidates a portion of its Reserves, guess what China is going to buy with the Dollars and Euros it receives for its Dollar and Euro Bonds?
The majority of Reserves are held in Dollars, as we have said, and when the Dollar Bonds are sold, they are sold for Dollars to satisfy the Capital flight, and buying the Dollar makes its relative value rise.
From a low point, some years ago, of about 71 against a basket of currencies, the Dollar has appreciated to 100 at the present time, increasing the strain upon debtors (in the exporting countries) who owe Dollars by some 41%. The strain upon the debtors increases the urgency in getting out of Dollar debt and stimulates the related Capital flight.
What we are witnessing these days is a mighty contraction in economic activity around the world, that reinforces itself. International Reserves are being sold off in a desperate search for liquidity. The contraction was originally seeded by a slow-down in the economies of the Reserve-issuing countries, i.e., USA, Britain, Europe and Japan.
The Chinese evidently have some plans which they are not divulging, for we see that China is purchasing huge amounts of gold. In the meantime, the US insists on trashing the price of gold, as if to say that the Dollar is and will remain the world’s supreme currency till the end of time.
China is quietly accumulating gold and saying nothing. But we can try to guess what China is thinking: “The US is mired in an insoluble problem. Do nothing to provoke the US. The US will destroy itself in a huge collapse.”
A world struggling with increasingly severe economic problems is not a world that is going to be in the mood or in condition to continue to respect international treaties regulating commerce, much less such regulatory dreams as co-ordinate action on “Climate Change”.
What lies ahead is a situation where each country will attempt desperate measures to ensure a minimum of internal stability. Treaties will be ignored or thrown overboard. Devaluations around the world will proliferate; some countries will declare bankruptcy.
The gravity of the crisis will make these events inevitable. We have just seen India refuse to abide by the rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO); the WTO rules say that governments are not to grant subsidies to sectors of their economies.
But India is forced to subsidize its agriculture, because it has a population of over 1 billion and 67% of the people depend on cheap food for survival. So the statist international rules – emanating mainly from the US – to regulate the whole world will be trashed, eventually.
When push comes to shove, China, with 1.3 billion or more population, will take unorthodox measures.
The pressure of the enormous population of China, made up of quite intelligent men and women, is going to force its government to stop adhering to international covenants. China will take whatever measures can offer hope to the Chinese.
China will then say to the world: “We sell cheap. Very cheap. But, we sell for gold, for very little gold; and we pay with gold for what we buy – for very little gold, but we pay gold.
You want our stuff, you find a way to pay us in gold. Or else, what do you have to offer us, in exchange for our stuff? You have something we want – we pay in gold. Rest of the world, do as you please.”
The nations of the world are not going to flounder endlessly in the crisis that is upon us. Out of the huge crisis, China will break away and state its terms. And the terms will be: GOLD. The rest of the world will follow.
Take Care Tony
http://ift.tt/1Ym7Z5N
Links Below To Previous Related Subject
http://ift.tt/1O9vCPw
http://ift.tt/1MfYVIS_
A world struggling with increasingly severe economic problems is not a world that is going to be in the mood or in condition to continue to respect international treaties regulating commerce, much less such regulatory dreams as co-ordinate action on “Climate Change”.
What lies ahead is a situation where each country will attempt desperate measures to ensure a minimum of internal stability. Treaties will be ignored or thrown overboard. Devaluations around the world will proliferate; some countries will declare bankruptcy.
The gravity of the crisis will make these events inevitable. We have just seen India refuse to abide by the rules of the World Trade Organization (WTO); the WTO rules say that governments are not to grant subsidies to sectors of their economies.
But India is forced to subsidize its agriculture, because it has a population of over 1 billion and 67% of the people depend on cheap food for survival. So the statist international rules – emanating mainly from the US – to regulate the whole world will be trashed, eventually.
When push comes to shove, China, with 1.3 billion or more population, will take unorthodox measures.
The pressure of the enormous population of China, made up of quite intelligent men and women, is going to force its government to stop adhering to international covenants. China will take whatever measures can offer hope to the Chinese.
China will then say to the world: “We sell cheap. Very cheap. But, we sell for gold, for very little gold; and we pay with gold for what we buy – for very little gold, but we pay gold.
You want our stuff, you find a way to pay us in gold. Or else, what do you have to offer us, in exchange for our stuff? You have something we want – we pay in gold. Rest of the world, do as you please.”
The nations of the world are not going to flounder endlessly in the crisis that is upon us. Out of the huge crisis, China will break away and state its terms. And the terms will be: GOLD. The rest of the world will follow.
Take Care Tony
http://ift.tt/1Ym7Z5N
Links Below To Previous Related Subject
http://ift.tt/1O9vCPw
http://ift.tt/1MfYVIS_
via Dinar Recaps - Our Blog http://ift.tt/1NE1wOw
No comments:
Post a Comment