WSOMN:
Brigantine: Mike Cottrell is charged with re-funding the treasury once he recovers the monies stolen from him by the bush cabal. so, nothing happens, till Cottrell gets paid.
Cheif53: I believe Michael Cottrell has a controlling signature for release of some Prosperity Packages
Cheri: Cottrell was supposed to go last night according to my sources!
Oscar: Who the heck is Cotrell and why are we just hearing about him now?
IcelandRox: Cottrell's not a new player.. he's been in this for a long time
Oscar: Iceland- so why did C ottrell surface today? what is new?
....
Brigantine: Mike Cottrell is charged with re-funding the treasury once he recovers the monies stolen from him by the bush cabal. so, nothing happens, till Cottrell gets paid.
Cheif53: I believe Michael Cottrell has a controlling signature for release of some Prosperity Packages
Cheri: Cottrell was supposed to go last night according to my sources!
Oscar: Who the heck is Cotrell and why are we just hearing about him now?
IcelandRox: Cottrell's not a new player.. he's been in this for a long time
Oscar: Iceland- so why did C ottrell surface today? what is new?
....
Brigantine: Cottrell surfaced today because I got sick of all the stupid bank rumors and stated simply, we don't get paid until cottrell gets paid.
IcelandRox: Oscar supposedly, according to Tilton, MC getting paid over the weekend... but unfortunately, cmkxers have heard that for years
LifeisArt: OSCAR, IT'S NOT 'ANY NEW PEOPLE' .. IT IS A VERY, VERY LONG HISTORY, AND BECAME QUITE CONVOLUDED BY THE MIXINGS IN OF POLITICAL/BANKING.
IT'S BEEN A LONG STRUGGLE.
IT'S NOT JUST ABOUT OUR QUICK AND HOPEFUL EXCHANGE OF SOME PAPER NOTES. NOT A CHOICE I'D OF PREFERRED, BUT IT IS COMPLEX, AND IT IS A WHOLE PROCESS, NOT JUST AN 'EVEN'T TO HAPPEN. AND, I KNOW ITS DIFFICULT TO WRAP THE BRAIN AROUND, BUT I'M SEEING THE CONCLUSIONS. IN A WHILE, THE HISTORY WILL BE JUST THAT, HISTORY.
OSCAR, THESE 'INTEL PROVIDERS' OF TODAY, AND OVER THESE PAST 6-8 YEARS, ARE NOT TIED INTO ANYTHING OF THE REAL HISTORY OF THIS SITUATION. THEY ARE PRIMARILY FOCUSED ON THEIR OWN PIECE OF THIS PUZZLE.
FOR INSTANCE, BGG, FRANK26, ALONG W/ HIS TEAM, IS A BRILLIANT RESEARCHER, FOCUS ON IRAQ, WANGDANG, FOCUSED ON THE QI-CARDS. GERRY/IKO/ART, ARE ALL ON THE RV/GCR. THE GCR ='S MASTER PLAN.
THEY ALL HAVE THEIR PIECES.
COTRELL, HEAVY WEIGHT BEHIND THE SCENES, ALWAYS HAS BEEN.
Brigantine: here's some background info, it's a long story:
http://ift.tt/1TdeRnk
*************
Wonderful2016: GM everyone we need to stay focus on what is really going on with the RV. This his nothing to do with anyone being paid. This is a Global reset. Right now America is on it's way to being in trouble, if we do not do something right away. Look at the stock market yesterday this can not last. Those of you who been here should know. This is not about one person.imo
Cheif53: I believe any delays have to do with security at this point & part of this is the CIPS system coming online everywhere
Pavy: Chief I think your right this cips system will make all the difference…. I do think most of what still has to happen has already happened and security is number one
Kind like IRAQ has been ready for some time but the Intel makes it seem like they are not ready, then all of a sudden something has been completed
Dr. Mark: This opportunity is getting closer and closer. My associates and I were having a conversation and their brokers were saying basically that the market is holding on by a threat and wouldn't be surprise to see a mild crash in the "near" future. They got out of the market and converted to cash.....only to see the dollar weaken more. It's on its way!!
************
Evenstar: could this be a high level arrest that zap and others talks about is happening behind the scenes????
Ex-Argentine leader Fernandez indicted in central bank case
The transactions referred to in the case involved $5 billion to $17 billion, according to court papers published by Argentina’s Judicial Information Center (CIJ).
“It’s impossible to believe that a financial operation of this size … could have been carried out without the approval of the highest executive level of the national government,” the ruling said.
http://ift.tt/1TLEh7k
**********************************
WSOMN:
AdminBill: SORRY GUYS AND GALS - I HAVE NOTHING TO REPORT THIS MORNING. THAT COULD BE GOOD OR IT COULD SIMPLY MEAN NOTHING IS GOING ON AT THIS MOMENT.
Emailed to Recaps:
Details Emerge on Global Bank Heists by Hackers
The Central Bank of the Philippines foiled attempts to hack its website, its governor said on Thursday, after a warning from the global financial network Swift about hackers targeting its system.
Just how securely are banks moving money around the world?
New details emerged on Friday about a pair of related attacks on banks that use the Swift message service, which allows financial firms and companies to transfer payments around the world
.
Computer security researchers briefed on the investigation into one of the attacks, on the Bangladesh Bank, raised several theories about the crime, including the possibility that groups from Pakistan and North Korea may have been spying on the bank. Other analysts investigating the attacks said there were striking similarities between the “multiple bespoke tools” used by the hackers in both the banking cases and the attack on Sony Pictures in 2014.
The latest breach detailed by Swift in a letter to its users on Friday occurred at a commercial bank that appeared, according to a leading online security firm BAE Systems on Friday, to be located in Vietnam. That attack and the $81 million heist from the Bangladesh central bank account at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in February are thought to be part of a broad assault on the global banking system by thieves whose operating methods and digital fingerprints are being studied carefully by analysts worldwide.
In both attacks on banks, the intruders obtained legitimate credentials to sign in to the Swift network. They initiated fraudulent money transfers, then covered their tracks using tailor-made malware.
Swift, an acronym for the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, is a global banking consortium that operates a secure and trusted network that sends payment instructions between banks across international borders. In the predictable finger-pointing that has followed the news of the attacks, Swift has pointed out that its core network was not hacked — just the end points at which the banks tap into it — and the New York Fed has reiterated that it followed all proper procedures.
On Friday, Representative Carolyn B. Maloney, Democrat of New York, released a statement calling on the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to bolster its security even further.
“I remain concerned that there are critical security gaps in the international payment system,” Ms. Maloney said in a statement. She also released correspondence between her office and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, in which the bank’s general counsel, Thomas C. Baxter Jr., assured her that “there is no evidence that any Federal Reserve systems were compromised.”
Investigators briefed on the investigation at the Bangladesh central bank say that they had uncovered the presence of three groups of intruders inside the bank’s systems: two nations — Pakistan and North Korea — and a third, unidentified group of digital criminals thought to have siphoned the funds from the bank to accounts in the Philippines.
The investigators pointed to specialized, identical tools — including identical encryption keys, file names and a highly unusual data deletion technique — that were used in the attack on Sony Pictures, the Bangladesh central bank and the Vietnamese bank. However, people briefed on the actual investigation at the Bangladesh bank, who would speak only on the condition that they not be named, said that while the same tools were present inside Bangladesh’s systems, suggesting any link between that heist and the North Korean hackers would be premature.
In the heist at Bangladesh Bank, the thieves used the stolen credentials to authorize the transfer of $951 million from the central bank’s account at the New York Fed.
The Fed approved five of the payments to accounts in Sri Lanka and the Philippines. As far as the bank employees in the United States could tell, the payment requests had been authenticated by Swift.
One of those five requests was ultimately blocked by a bank in Sri Lanka, which noticed that the name of the supposed nonprofit group that was to receive the funds was misspelled. Instead of “Foundation,” it was spelled “Fundation,” according to a person briefed on the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of a continuing criminal investigation.
The New York officials relied entirely on Swift to authenticate the transfers, according to a letter from the New York Fed that Ms. Maloney’s office released on Friday. It does not independently vet other users on the Swift network.
The New York Fed withheld an additional 30 requested transfers from Bangladesh because one address that was supposed to receive a payment contained the same name as a ship known for smuggling activity, the person briefed on the matter said.
It turned out the address and the smuggling ship were unrelated, but that was enough to raise the New York Fed’s concerns. When they couldn’t reconfirm with officials in Bangladesh that transfers were legitimate, the New York bank denied them.
http://ift.tt/1TdeWXW
Details Emerge on Global Bank Heists by Hackers
The Central Bank of the Philippines foiled attempts to hack its website, its governor said on Thursday, after a warning from the global financial network Swift about hackers targeting its system.
Just how securely are banks moving money around the world?
New details emerged on Friday about a pair of related attacks on banks that use the Swift message service, which allows financial firms and companies to transfer payments around the world
.
Computer security researchers briefed on the investigation into one of the attacks, on the Bangladesh Bank, raised several theories about the crime, including the possibility that groups from Pakistan and North Korea may have been spying on the bank. Other analysts investigating the attacks said there were striking similarities between the “multiple bespoke tools” used by the hackers in both the banking cases and the attack on Sony Pictures in 2014.
The latest breach detailed by Swift in a letter to its users on Friday occurred at a commercial bank that appeared, according to a leading online security firm BAE Systems on Friday, to be located in Vietnam. That attack and the $81 million heist from the Bangladesh central bank account at the Federal Reserve Bank of New York in February are thought to be part of a broad assault on the global banking system by thieves whose operating methods and digital fingerprints are being studied carefully by analysts worldwide.
In both attacks on banks, the intruders obtained legitimate credentials to sign in to the Swift network. They initiated fraudulent money transfers, then covered their tracks using tailor-made malware.
Swift, an acronym for the Society for Worldwide Interbank Financial Telecommunication, is a global banking consortium that operates a secure and trusted network that sends payment instructions between banks across international borders. In the predictable finger-pointing that has followed the news of the attacks, Swift has pointed out that its core network was not hacked — just the end points at which the banks tap into it — and the New York Fed has reiterated that it followed all proper procedures.
On Friday, Representative Carolyn B. Maloney, Democrat of New York, released a statement calling on the Federal Reserve Bank of New York to bolster its security even further.
“I remain concerned that there are critical security gaps in the international payment system,” Ms. Maloney said in a statement. She also released correspondence between her office and the Federal Reserve Bank of New York, in which the bank’s general counsel, Thomas C. Baxter Jr., assured her that “there is no evidence that any Federal Reserve systems were compromised.”
Investigators briefed on the investigation at the Bangladesh central bank say that they had uncovered the presence of three groups of intruders inside the bank’s systems: two nations — Pakistan and North Korea — and a third, unidentified group of digital criminals thought to have siphoned the funds from the bank to accounts in the Philippines.
The investigators pointed to specialized, identical tools — including identical encryption keys, file names and a highly unusual data deletion technique — that were used in the attack on Sony Pictures, the Bangladesh central bank and the Vietnamese bank. However, people briefed on the actual investigation at the Bangladesh bank, who would speak only on the condition that they not be named, said that while the same tools were present inside Bangladesh’s systems, suggesting any link between that heist and the North Korean hackers would be premature.
In the heist at Bangladesh Bank, the thieves used the stolen credentials to authorize the transfer of $951 million from the central bank’s account at the New York Fed.
The Fed approved five of the payments to accounts in Sri Lanka and the Philippines. As far as the bank employees in the United States could tell, the payment requests had been authenticated by Swift.
One of those five requests was ultimately blocked by a bank in Sri Lanka, which noticed that the name of the supposed nonprofit group that was to receive the funds was misspelled. Instead of “Foundation,” it was spelled “Fundation,” according to a person briefed on the matter, who spoke on the condition of anonymity because of a continuing criminal investigation.
The New York officials relied entirely on Swift to authenticate the transfers, according to a letter from the New York Fed that Ms. Maloney’s office released on Friday. It does not independently vet other users on the Swift network.
The New York Fed withheld an additional 30 requested transfers from Bangladesh because one address that was supposed to receive a payment contained the same name as a ship known for smuggling activity, the person briefed on the matter said.
It turned out the address and the smuggling ship were unrelated, but that was enough to raise the New York Fed’s concerns. When they couldn’t reconfirm with officials in Bangladesh that transfers were legitimate, the New York bank denied them.
http://ift.tt/1TdeWXW
via Dinar Recaps - Our Blog http://ift.tt/1Tdkajf
No comments:
Post a Comment